Weak and Strong Constructivist Foundations

Constructivist Foundations 9 (1):19-21 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “Constructivism and Computation: Can Computer-Based Modeling Add to the Case for Constructivism?” by Manfred Füllsack. Upshot: Füllsack’s article offers many interesting ideas but falls short of elucidating the relationship between constructivism and computation. It could profit by taking into consideration stronger constructivist foundations such as the distinction between machine and organism, the relationship between reality and the observer, and Ceccato’s theory of attention

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,774

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Are Computers Digital? Should Constructivists Care?S. Franchi - 2013 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (1):17-19.
The Construction of the Environment.B. Porr - 2013 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (1):21-22.
What Exists between Realism and Constructivism?A. Nassehi - 2012 - Constructivist Foundations 8 (1):14-15.
Some Remarks on the Social Construction of Constructivism.Raf Vanderstaeten - 2018 - Constructivist Foundations 13 (2):201-202.
Towards a Metaphysics for Constructivist Thought.S. A. Koutroufinis - 2015 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (1):163-165.
RC is a Theory of Learning, not Teaching.A. Engström - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (3):314-316.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-17

Downloads
13 (#1,332,621)

6 months
6 (#812,813)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references