- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Cognitive Psychological Support for the ADC Model of Moral Judgment
American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 5 (4):21-23 (2014)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Clarifications of the Descriptive/Normative Distinction in Dubljević and Racine's “The ADC of Moral Judgment”.Dale Murray - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 5 (4):27-29.
Separating Agency From Deeds in Immoral Neurological Patients: A Potential Challenge to the ADC Model.R. Ryan Darby - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 5 (4):25-27.
The ADC of Moral Judgment: Opening the Black Box of Moral Intuitions With Heuristics About Agents, Deeds, and Consequences.Veljko Dubljević & Eric Racine - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 5 (4):3-20.
Critique of Moral Judgment: Sociology Versus Neuroscience.Miran Epstein - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 2 (2):26-28.
The Applicability of Psychological and Moral Distinctions in an Emerging Neuroscientific Framework.Nada Gligorov - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 7 (4):191-192.
The Neuroscience of Moral Judgment.Joanna Demaree-Cotton & Guy Kahane - 2018 - In Aaron Zimmerman, Karen Jones & Mark Timmons (eds.), Routledge Handbook on Moral Epistemology. New York: Routledge. pp. 84–104.
The Neuroscience of Moral Judgment.Joanna Demaree-Cotton & Guy Kahane - 2018 - In Aaron Zimmerman, Karen Jones & Mark Timmons (eds.), Routledge Handbook on Moral Epistemology. New York: Routledge. pp. 84–104.
Cognitive Enhancement and Metaphor Choice as Moral Choice.Paul Tubig & Sierra Simmerman - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 10 (1):50-51.
Toward Implementing the ADC Model of Moral Judgment in Autonomous Vehicles.Veljko Dubljević - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (5):2461-2472.
Prospective Benefit plus Moral Status: A Hybrid Model.Peter Maloy Koch - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 12 (2-3):146-148.
Analytics
Added to PP
2018-06-22
Downloads
19 (#1,088,569)
6 months
9 (#519,282)
2018-06-22
Downloads
19 (#1,088,569)
6 months
9 (#519,282)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
References found in this work
Cognitive Load Selectively Interferes with Utilitarian Moral Judgment.Jonathan D. Cohen Joshua D. Greene, Sylvia A. Morelli, Kelly Lowenberg, Leigh E. Nystrom - 2008 - Cognition 107 (3):1144.
Beyond dual-process models: A categorisation of processes underlying intuitive judgement and decision making.Cilia Witteman & Andreas Glöckner - 2010 - Thinking and Reasoning 16 (1):1-25.
Conflict detection, dual processes, and logical intuitions: Some clarifications.Wim De Neys - 2014 - Thinking and Reasoning 20 (2):169-187.
The ADC of Moral Judgment: Opening the Black Box of Moral Intuitions With Heuristics About Agents, Deeds, and Consequences.Veljko Dubljević & Eric Racine - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 5 (4):3-20.
Smarter Than We Think When Our Brains Detect That We Are Biased.Wim De Neys, Oshin Vartanian & Vinod Goel - 2008 - Psychological Science 19 (5):483-489.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-7qg25 dc2