Christian Public Reasoning in the United Kingdom: Apologetic, Casuistical, and Rhetorically Discriminate

Studies in Christian Ethics 25 (2):141-147 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Since the 1960s Christian ethics in Britain has become stronger, more theological, and more Protestant, so that its moral intelligence is now much more fully informed by the full range of theological premises. In the future, however, Christian ethics needs to make up certain recent losses: to re-engage with moral philosophy, in order to rebut the glib dismissal of religious ethics by popularising atheists; to read less philosophy and more history, in order to become plausible to public policy-makers; and to revive the model of interdisciplinary work, in order both to understand the matter which it would interpret morally and to inject Christian analyses and judgements into the bloodstream of public discourse

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ronald Preston and the Future of Christian Ethics.Normunds Kamergrauzis - 2004 - Studies in Christian Ethics 17 (2):62-86.
The Vocation of Parenthood: A Response to Stephen Post.William Werpehowski - 1997 - Journal of Religious Ethics 25 (1):177-182.
In Defence of War by Nigel Biggar.Myles Werntz - 2015 - Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics 35 (2):202-203.
Can Love Walk the Battlefield? A Reply to Nigel Biggar.Vic McCracken - 2018 - Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics 38 (1):59-76.
The Oxford handbook of theological ethics.Gilbert Meilaender & William Werpehowski (eds.) - 2005 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-05-31

Downloads
32 (#713,415)

6 months
4 (#1,269,568)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references