Paternalism and Public Policy

Economics and Philosophy 15 (1):63 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Wherever a government or state is concerned with the welfare of its citizens, there will probably also exist policies which compel the individual citizen to undertake or abstain from activities which affect that citizen alone. The set of theories behind such policies is collectively known as ‘paternalism’. It is not hard to understand why this term has developed strong pejorative overtones. Policies of this type appear to offend a fundamental tenet of liberal societies: namely, that the individual is best placed to know what is in his or her interests. Paternalistic policies imply, and are concerned with correcting, failures of precisely this kind of judgement. And yet, at the same time, there is a popular consensus that compelling people to wear a seat belt when driving a car is a reasonable restriction of personal liberty. Paternalism may be difficult to accept in principle, but it is equally difficult to avoid in practice. Not surprisingly, the literature reveals a long heritage of debate in a wide range of academic disciplines. This debate reveals a failure to make progress in two areas in particular. First, analyses of paternalism often confuse policies which are actually concerned with correcting failures of market exchange — in particular, those concerned with insufficient or imperfect information — with those which are genuinely paternalistic. One objective of this paper will be to clarify the difference between these two kinds of policy

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Behavioural economics and paternalism.Daniel M. Hausman - 2018 - Economics and Philosophy 34 (1):53-66.
Public Bioethics.Jessica Flanigan - 2013 - Public Health Ethics 6 (2):170-184.
Paternalism and Populations.Tom Walker - 2016 - Public Health Ethics 9 (1):46-54.
Paternalism, respect and dialogue.Soo Jin Kim - 2023 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 49 (4):492-517.
Paternalism, respect and dialogue.Soo Jin Kim - 2023 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 49 (4):492-517.
Paternalism, respect and dialogue.Soo Jin Kim - 2023 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 49 (4):492-517.
Paternalism, respect and dialogue.Soo Jin Kim - 2023 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 49 (4):492-517.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
160 (#146,070)

6 months
18 (#171,219)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - New York: Basic Books.
Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Why We Should Reject S.Derek Parfit - 1984 - In Reasons and Persons. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
On Liberty.John Stuart Mill - 1859 - Broadview Press.

View all 16 references / Add more references