Not Enough Primary Categories in Peikoff's DIM? Salutary Eclecticism and an ACID Test

Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 18 (1):98-104 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The author reprises his review of The DIM Hypothesis by arguing for an expansion and revision of Leonard Peikoff's model to include not three, but four primary positions regarding integration : Integration, Disintegration, Abstract Misintegration, and Concrete Misintegration—and to include not just two mixtures of those primary positions, but twelve. He offers it as a work in progress and a remedy to the over-restrictiveness and resulting misrepresentations of various philosophers by Peikoff's version of the model.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Beneath The DIM Hypothesis.Roger E. Bissell - 2013 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 13 (2):160-204.
The DIM Antithesis.Dennis C. Hardin - 2014 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 14 (2):148-162.
What Ayn Never Told Us. [REVIEW]Dennis C. Hardin - 2020 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 20 (1):4-73.
Reply to Roger E. Bissell.George Lyons - 2021 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 21 (1):118-126.
Reply to Roger E. Bissell: Perplexing Logic.Dennis C. Hardin - 2013 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 13 (1):69-72.
Music and perceptual cognition.Roger E. Bissell - 1999 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 1 (1):59 - 86.
Introduction.Chris Matthew Sciabarra - 2021 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 21 (2):v-viii.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-14

Downloads
21 (#1,003,416)

6 months
5 (#1,037,427)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations