Sources of the Desire/Belief Thesis

In Doing things for reasons. New York: Oxford University Press (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Explores the ancestry of the desire‐belief‐theory. It is generally assumed to derive from David Hume's conception, epitomized in his statement that the impulse for action does not arise from reason, but is only directed by it. In fact, though, this view is not credibly supported by argument and must rest, rather, on traditional assumptions. Their source is Plato: the doctrine of the soul in Phaedrus expounds, contrary to many scholars’ opinion, essentially the understanding of action that we are familiar with from Hume. What made this understanding of action attractive becomes also apparent in considering Plato: if reason gives desire direction, there can be action in accordance with what there is. Nevertheless we should drop the idea: it brings with it domination within the soul.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,010

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Wants and desires: A critique of conativist theory of motivation.Chris Meyers - 2005 - Journal of Philosophical Research:357-370.
Desire and Belief.Rüdiger Bittner - 2001 - In Doing things for reasons. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hume, Passion, and Action.Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe - 2018 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Reasons and the ambiguity of 'belief'.Maria Alvarez - 2008 - Philosophical Explorations 11 (1):53 – 65.
Acting and Understanding.Alexander Stathopoulos - 2016 - Dissertation, University of St. Andrews

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-25

Downloads
7 (#1,637,817)

6 months
6 (#861,180)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references