Rhetoric, Dialectic, and Logic as Related to Argument

Philosophy and Rhetoric 45 (2):148-164 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article challenges the view that rhetoric, dialectic and logic are three perspectives on argument, relating respectively to its process, its procedure, and its product. It also questions the view that rhetorical arguments represent a distinctive type. It suggests that, as related to argument, rhetoric is the theory of arguments in speeches, dialectics the theory of arguments in conversations, and logic the theory of good reasoning in each.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-09-13

Downloads
45 (#484,485)

6 months
7 (#669,170)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Anthony Blair
University of Windsor

References found in this work

Normativity.Judith Jarvis Thomson - 2007 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics 2:240-266.
Ethics and Language.Charles L. Stevenson - 1945 - Ethics 55 (3):209-215.
Ethics and Language.Charles L. Stevenson - 1945 - Mind 54 (216):362-373.
Acts of Arguing, A Rhetorical Model of Argument (ARNO R. LODDER).C. W. Tindale - 1999 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (1):73-78.
Prescriptive Language.R. M. Hare - 1952 - In Richard Mervyn Hare (ed.), The Language of Morals. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

View all 14 references / Add more references