- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Average faces: How does the averaging process change faces physically and perceptually?
Cognition 216 (C):104867 (2021)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Physically attractive faces attract us physically.Robin S. S. Kramer, Jerrica Mulgrew, Nicola C. Anderson, Daniil Vasilyev, Alan Kingstone, Michael G. Reynolds & Robert Ward - 2020 - Cognition 198 (C):104193.
People with Williams syndrome process faces holistically.Helen Tager-Flusberg, Daniela Plesa-Skwerer, Susan Faja & Robert M. Joseph - 2003 - Cognition 89 (1):11-24.
Attractiveness bias: A cognitive explanation.Stevie S. Schein, Logan T. Trujillo & Judith H. Langlois - 2017 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40.
Change in Evaluation Mode Can Cause a Cheerleader Effect.Claude Messner, Mattia Carnelli & Patrick Stefan Höhener - 2021 - Frontiers in Psychology 12.
How do we describe other people from voices and faces?Nadine Lavan - 2023 - Cognition 230 (C):105253.
Face proprioception does not modulate access to visual awareness of emotional faces in a continuous flash suppression paradigm.Sebastian Korb, Sofia A. Osimo, Tiziano Suran, Ariel Goldstein & Raffaella Ida Rumiati - 2017 - Consciousness and Cognition 51:166-180.
Every look matters: appraisals of faces follow distinct rules of information integration under arousing versus non-arousing conditions.Martina Kaufmann & Nicola Baumann - 2018 - Cognition and Emotion 33 (2):305-317.
Analytics
Added to PP
2022-11-21
Downloads
8 (#1,579,776)
6 months
5 (#1,039,842)
2022-11-21
Downloads
8 (#1,579,776)
6 months
5 (#1,039,842)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
References found in this work
Categorical effects in the perception of faces.James M. Beale & Frank C. Keil - 1995 - Cognition 57 (3):217-239.
Viewers base estimates of face matching accuracy on their own familiarity: Explaining the photo-ID paradox.Kay L. Ritchie, Finlay G. Smith, Rob Jenkins, Markus Bindemann, David White & A. Mike Burton - 2015 - Cognition 141 (C):161-169.
Early maturity of face recognition: No childhood development of holistic processing, novel face encoding, or face-space.Kate Crookes & Elinor McKone - 2009 - Cognition 111 (2):219-247.
Matching identities of familiar and unfamiliar faces caught on CCTV images.Vicki Bruce, Zoë Henderson, Craig Newman & A. Mike Burton - 2001 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 7 (3):207.
Camera-to-subject distance affects face configuration and perceived identity.Eilidh Noyes & Rob Jenkins - 2017 - Cognition 165 (C):97-104.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-wmc4m dc2