Biopolitics and deliberation – Challenging the ideal of consensus in the name of ethics

In Helene Gerhards & Kathrin Braun (eds.), Biopolitiken – Regierungen des Lebens Heute. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. pp. 229-248 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article, with special regard to biopolitics, I will challenge the common assumption in the social sciences that the rise of ethics is deeply associated with a process of de-politicisation. Rather, I will show that the usual unease in the social sciences with the rise of ethics is inappropriate for the most part. Taking national ethics councils as an example, I will show that currently the consensus approach in policy advice is challenged by a deliberation model evolved and established under the dominance of the ethical discourse. As ethical deliberation corresponds to the basic cornerstones of democratic debate, the current trend towards an ethicisation of technology may help politicising technology issues. In my view, we should understand the contemporary tendency to negotiate biopolitical issues under the header of ethics as an opportunity for politicization.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,553

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Democratic Biopolitics of PrEP.Karsten Schubert - 2019 - In Helene Gerhards & Kathrin Braun (eds.), Biopolitiken – Regierungen des Lebens Heute. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. pp. 121-153.
The Democratic Biopolitics of PrEP.Karsten Schubert - 2019 - In Helene Gerhards & Kathrin Braun (eds.), Biopolitiken – Regierungen des Lebens Heute. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. pp. 121-153.
The Democratic Biopolitics of PrEP.Karsten Schubert - 2019 - In Helene Gerhards & Kathrin Braun (eds.), Biopolitiken – Regierungen des Lebens Heute. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. pp. 121-153.
Freedom of choice, community and deliberation.Klas Roth - 2003 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 37 (3):393–413.
Not Up For Debate.Justin Horn - 2024 - Teaching Philosophy 47 (1):23-32.
Ethics by committee: The moral authority of consensus.Jonathan D. Moreno - 1988 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (4):411-432.
Deliberative perfectionism.Matteo Bonotti - 2015 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 41 (7):637-653.
Can AI Achieve Common Good and Well-being? Implementing the NSTC's R&D Guidelines with a Human-Centered Ethical Approach.Jr-Jiun Lian - 2024 - 2024 Annual Conference on Science, Technology, and Society (Sts) Academic Paper, National Taitung University. Translated by Jr-Jiun Lian.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-17

Downloads
6 (#1,704,271)

6 months
3 (#1,498,028)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Transbiopolitics: Ontology and Metatheory of Managed Evolution.Valentin Cheshko & Kuz Oleh - 2021 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 4 (1):1-11.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references