The Moral Turing Test: a defense

Philosophy and Technology 37 (3):1-13 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I raise the question whether an artificial intelligence can act morally. I first sketch and defend a general picture of what is at stake in this question. I then sketch and defend a behavioral test, known as the Moral Turing Test, as a good sufficiency test for an artificial intelligence acting morally. I end by discussing some general anticipated objections.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,169

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-08-29

Downloads
22 (#1,071,209)

6 months
15 (#211,851)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Einar Duenger Bohn
University Of Agder

Citations of this work

Turing’s Test vs the Moral Turing Test.Diane Proudfoot - 2024 - Philosophy and Technology 37 (4):1-14.
In Defense of the Moral Turing Test: A Reply.Einar Duenger Bohn - 2025 - Philosophy and Technology 38 (2):1-3.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Minds, brains, and programs.John Searle - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3):417-57.
The philosophy of information.Luciano Floridi - 2010 - The Philosophers' Magazine 50:42-43.
Prolegomena to any future artificial moral agent.Colin Allen & Gary Varner - 2000 - Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 12 (3):251--261.

View all 14 references / Add more references