The New Experimentalism and the Value of Experimental Justification in Empirical Sciences

Studia Philosophiae Christianae 56 (S2):21-59 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article briefly presents and characterizes a relatively young (nineteen-nineties) trend in methodology, the theory of science – and philosophy, called “the new experimentalism”. The fundamental problem is determined by the question about the value of the new experimentalism and experimental grounds of scientific knowledge in empirical sciences. In the first part of the article, the previous (old) experimentalism is presented. First of all, the history of the experimental method is outlined and the definitions of experiment, object, phenomenon, and of the carried out and analyzed observation are provided. It is shown why the main proposition of experimentalists – “determining a fact based on sensory experience” is fallacious. The second part describes the way in which the representatives of the new experimentalism try to identify and characterize those factors of an experiment that guarantee the objectivity of its result; demonstrate that results are not only determined by psychological, historical, sociological or economic factors but also that they exist in nature as real objects and events. A correct and reliable analysis of the experiment and its results may – according to the new experimentalists – contribute to this conclusion. Therefore, the important role and value of the experimental foundation of social activity in general, and in particular, for the natural sciences, is rightly noted.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

New experimentalism and computer-aided experiments.Sławomir Grzegorz Leciejewski - 2023 - Zagadnienia Filozoficzne W Nauce 75:107-134.
Social Information.Keith Lehrer - 1977 - The Monist 60 (4):473-487.
Experiment.Uljana Feest & Friedrich Steinle - 2014 - In Paul Humphreys (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Science. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press. pp. 274-295.
A defense of intuitions.S. Matthew Liao - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 140 (2):247 - 262.
Question-driven stepwise experimental discoveries in biochemistry: two case studies.Michael Fry - 2022 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 44 (2):1-52.
The New Experimentalism, Topical Hypotheses, and Learning from Error.Deborah G. Mayo - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:270-279.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-21

Downloads
21 (#1,005,339)

6 months
9 (#485,111)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The power of ARCHED hypotheses: Feyerabend's Galileo as a closet rationalist.Neil Thomason - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (1):255-264.
Review: The New Experimentalism. [REVIEW]Robert Ackermann - 1989 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40 (2):185 - 190.

Add more references