Reasons to act and the mental representation of consequentialist aberrations

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (5-6):453-454 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

If imagination is guided by the same principles as rational thoughts, then we ought not to stop at the way people make inferences to get insights about the workings of imagination; we ought to consider as well the way they make rational choices. This broader approach accounts for the puzzling effect of reasons to act on the mutability of actions

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,459

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How Important Are Possessed Reasons?Jonathan Way - 2021 - Analysis 81 (1):156-167.
Against Internalism About Reasons—Gert’s Rational Options. [REVIEW]David Copp - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (2):455–461.
The rational imagination and other possibilities.Ruth Mj Byrne - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (5-6):470-476.
How we act: causes, reasons, and intentions.Berent Enç - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Intelligibilität und Normativität.Norbert Anwander - 2002 - Analyse & Kritik 24 (2):231-248.
Reasons as Evidence.Stephen Kearns & Daniel Star - 2009 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics 4:215-42.
The “is-ought fallacy” fallacy.Mike Oaksford & Nick Chater - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5):262-263.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-29

Downloads
20 (#1,050,317)

6 months
5 (#1,071,419)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?