Interaction an Cosmic Structure

Philosophy 6 (24):422-432 (1931)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is a momentous venture to attempt to frame an hypothesis of the universe. But if we reflect upon the meaning of life, we are forced to make such an effort. The only way we can escape the responsibility is to be guilty of the great refusal—the refusal to think. If we frame an hypothesis, it should be such as to assign the proper significance to all the facts of human experience—not merely the physical facts, but the biological and mental as well; not merely our scientific interests, but our æsthetic, ethical, and religious interests as well. And it should do so in the simplest possible way. It would be futile and impossible to examine all possible solutions. Henri Poincaré proved long ago that if there is one explanation of a class of phenomena, there are an infinite number of explanations.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,888

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Interaction and Cosmic Structure.John E. Boodin - 1931 - Philosophy 6 (24):422 - 432.
Limits, perspectives, and thought.John Shand - 2009 - Philosophy 84 (3):429-435.
Spaces and Times.L. Falkenstein - 1986 - Idealistic Studies 16 (1):1-11.
Explanatory Consolidation: From ‘Best’ to ‘Good Enough’.Finnur Dellsén - 2020 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 103 (1):157-177.
Our Cosmic Insignificance.Guy Kahane - 2013 - Noûs 47 (2):745-772.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
42 (#531,688)

6 months
18 (#161,822)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references