- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Authors’ Response: The M-N-L Framework: Bringing Radical Constructivist Theories to Daily Teaching Practices
Constructivist Foundations 12 (1):83-90 (2016)
Abstract
Upshot: We seek to address several questions and statements made in the commentaries by elaborating on the four main aspects of the M-N-L framework. Before doing so, we discuss the issue of constructivist teaching in the context of schools. We conclude by hypothesizing on what would be lost in the M-N-L framework by taking constructivism out of the picture.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
What Do We Lose If We Abandon Constructivism?B. Jaworski - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 12 (1):73-75.
Investigating Teaching from a Constructivist Stance: A Model of Communication.E. S. Tillema - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 12 (1):70-72.
Authors' Response: Interaction: A Core Hypothesis of Radical Constructivist Epistemology.E. S. Tillema, A. J. Hackenberg, C. Ulrich & A. Norton - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (3):354-359.
Toward a Model of Constructivist Mathematics Teaching.L. P. Steffe - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 12 (1):75-77.
Negotiating Between Learner and Mathematics: A Conceptual Framework to Analyze Teacher Sensitivity Toward Constructivism in a Mathematics Classroom.P. Borg, D. Hewitt & I. Jones - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 12 (1):59-69.
When Is a Constructivist not a Constructivist?T. McCloughlin - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 12 (1):79-80.
Authors' Response: Challenges in Studying and Teaching Innovation: Between Theory and Practice.M. F. Peschl, G. Bottaro, M. Hartner-Tiefenthaler & K. Rötzer - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (3):440-446.
Authors' Response: Radical Constructivist Conceptual Analyses in Mathematical Problem Solving and their Implications for Teaching.V. Sevim & V. V. Cifarelli - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (3):386-392.
Mathematical Observers Observing Mathematics.J. Proulx - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 12 (1):80-82.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-11-15
Downloads
34 (#698,174)
6 months
3 (#1,061,821)
2016-11-15
Downloads
34 (#698,174)
6 months
3 (#1,061,821)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-8567d8d854-kjfxj dc2