- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Deconstructive vs Pragmatic: A Critique of the Derrida–Searle Debate
The European Legacy 25 (1):62-81 (2020)
Abstract
The debate between Derrida and Searle has received much critical attention, with the commentary often being Derrida-friendly. Even when commentators detect weaknesses in Derrida’s argument, they ap...Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Derrida/Searle: Deconstruction and Ordinary Language.Maureen Chun & Timothy Attanucci (eds.) - 2014 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Derrida/Searle: Deconstruction and Ordinary Language.Raoul Moati & Jean-Michel Rabaté - 2014 - New York: Columbia University Press.
Language, philosophy and the risk of failure: Rereading the debate between Searle and Derrida. [REVIEW]Hagi Kenaan - 2002 - Continental Philosophy Review 35 (2):117-133.
Understanding Each Other: The Case of the Derrida-Searle Debate.Stanley Raffel - 2011 - Human Studies 34 (3):277-292.
Derrida/Searle: Deconstruction and Ordinary Language. [REVIEW]Bahar Otcu-Grillman - 2017 - The European Legacy 22 (3):372-374.
Working through Derrida.Gary Brent Madison (ed.) - 1993 - Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.
Un dialogue de sourds? Some implications of the Austin-Searle-Derrida debate.Ian Maclean - 1985 - Paragraph 5 (1):1-26.
Parasitic Speech Acts: Austin, Searle, Derrida.Kevin Halion - 1992 - Philosophy Today 36 (2):161-172.
Hermeneutics, deconstruction, and linguistic theory.Dieter Freundlieb - 1990 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 21 (1):183-203.
The Intentionality of Speech Acts: A Confrontation between Ordinary Language Philosophy, Phenomenology, and Deconstruction?Andreas Vrahimis - 2015 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 23 (4):584-594.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-08-23
Downloads
47 (#491,890)
6 months
6 (#572,300)
2019-08-23
Downloads
47 (#491,890)
6 months
6 (#572,300)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Philosophy of mind as a problem of philosophy and science: representatives of the west and east.Samal Jalmagambetova, Yessim Garifolla & Gulzhykhan Nurysheva - 2024 - Trans/Form/Ação 47 (2):e0240025.
References found in this work
Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind.John R. Searle - 1983 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
How to Do Things with Words: The William James Lectures Delivered in Harvard University in 1955.J. L. Austin - 1962 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press UK.
Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language.William P. Alston - 1970 - Philosophical Quarterly 20 (79):172-179.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-8567d8d854-kjfxj dc2