Farmers’ Rights: Intellectual Property Regimes and the Struggle over Seeds

Politics and Society 32 (4):511-543 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article analyzes “farmers’ rights” as a strategy of resistance against the perceived inequities of intellectual property rights regimes for plant varieties. As commercial models of intellectual property have made their way into agriculture, farmers’ traditional seed-saving practices have been increasingly delegitimized. In response, farmers have adopted the language of farmers’ rights to demand greater material recognition of their contributions and better measures to protect their autonomy. This campaign has mixed implications. On one hand, farmers’rights are a unique form of right that may help transform conventions of intellectual property in ways that are better suited for registering and materially encouraging alternative forms of innovation, such as those offered by farming communities. On the other hand, farmers’ rights have proved enormously difficult to enact. And by situating farmers’rights alongside easily enacted commercial breeders’rights, the campaign risks further legitimizing the inequities it is responding to.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sovereign and property rights over plant genetic resources.Carlos M. Correa - 1995 - Agriculture and Human Values 12 (4):58-79.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-26

Downloads
21 (#1,010,345)

6 months
6 (#873,397)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Qualified for Evaluation? A GM Potato and the Orders of Rural Worth.Helena Valve - 2012 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (3):315-331.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Whose knowledge, whose genes, whose rights?Stephen B. Brush - 2011 - In Sandra Harding (ed.), The postcolonial science and technology studies reader. Durham: Duke University Press. pp. 225.

Add more references