Loving the Body, Loving the Soul: Conway’s Vitalist Critique of Cartesian and Morean Dualism

Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 9 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I examine Anne Conway’s ‘argument from love’ in her Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy. This argument, supported by a further argument, the ‘argument from pain’, undermines the dualist dichotomy between mind and matter by appealing to a vitalist similarity principle. My goal is two-fold: first, to contribute to a close systematic reconstruction and analysis of Conway’s arguments, which so far is largely lacking in the literature; second, to show that these arguments are richer and more compelling than commentators have thought.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,139

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Anne Conway’s Critique of Cartesian Dualism.Louise D. Derksen - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 13:29-34.
Anne Conway’s Exceptional Vitalism: Material Spirits and Active Matter.Doina-Cristina Rusu - 2021 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 11 (2):528-546.
Counting experiments.Jonathan Livengood - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 176 (1):175-195.
Vitalism and panpsychism in the philosophy of Anne Conway.Usa Norman - 2023 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 32 (5):1030-1051.
Anne Conway: A Woman Philosopher (review).Eileen O'Neill - 2006 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (1):122-124.
Vitalism and panpsychism in the philosophy of Anne Conway.Olivia Branscum - 2023 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 32 (5):1030-1051.
Conway and Charleton on the Intimate Presence of Souls in Bodies.Jacqueline Broad - 0035 - Journal of the History of Ideas 79 (4):571-591.
Anne Conway's response to Cartesianism.Christia Mercer - 2019 - In Steven Nadler, Tad M. Schmaltz & Delphine Antoine-Mahut (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-04-22

Downloads
3 (#1,851,971)

6 months
3 (#1,473,720)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Julia Borcherding
Cambridge University

Citations of this work

Anne Conway on Divine and Creaturely Freedom.Hope Sample - 2023 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 31 (6):1151-1167.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references