The diachronic threshold problem

Philosophical Studies (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper introduces a new problem for fallibilist and infallibilist epistemologies – the diachronic threshold problem. As the name suggests, this is a problem similar to the well–known threshold problem for fallibilism. The new problem affects both fallibilism and infallibilism, however. The paper argues that anyone who worries about the well known problem for fallibilism should also worry about this new, diachronic version of the problem.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Correction to: The diachronic threshold problem.Rodrigo Borges - 2022 - Philosophical Studies 179 (6):2079-2079.
A Solution to Knowledge’s Threshold Problem.Michael Hannon - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (3):607-629.
How to Be a Pragmatic Infallibilist.Brian Kim - 2023 - Southwest Philosophy Review 39 (1):145-153.
Skeptical Theism and the Threshold Problem.Yishai A. Cohen - 2013 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 18 (1):73-92.
More Clarity about Concessive Knowledge Attributions.James Simpson - 2022 - Southwest Philosophy Review 38 (1):59-69.
Pragmatic infallibilism.Brian Kim - 2023 - Asian Journal of Philosophy 2 (2):1-22.
Fallibilism and Multiple Paths to Knowledge.Wesley H. Holliday - 2015 - Oxford Studies in Epistemology 5:97-144.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-06-01

Downloads
391 (#73,064)

6 months
99 (#62,151)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rodrigo Borges
University of Florida

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Knowledge and its limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Theory of knowledge.Roderick M. Chisholm - 1966 - Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,: Prentice-Hall.
Thought.Gilbert Harman - 1973 - Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.

View all 40 references / Add more references