Mark Rowlands Animal Rights: A Philosophical Defence

Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (2):227-228 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Book Reviews. [REVIEW]J. Horton - 2000 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (2):225-233.
Stephen St. C. Bostock. Zoos and Animal Rights: The Ethics Of Keeping Animals.T. L. S. Sprigge - 1996 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 13:114-116.
Stephen St C. Bostock, Zoos and Animal Rights: The ethics of keeping animals Reviewed by.Doug Simak - 1994 - Philosophy in Review 14 (3):167-169.
Moral Animals: Can Animals Be Moral? Rowlands Mark Oxford University Press New York, NY. [REVIEW]Dan Hooley - 2014 - Journal of Animal Ethics 4 (2):86-92.
ROWLANDS, M.-Animal Rights.M. P. Leahy - 2000 - Philosophical Books 41 (2):134-135.
Is there a Rawlsian Argument for Animal Rights?David Svolba - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (4):973-984.
Ethics.[author unknown] - 2002 - Philosophical Books 41 (2):132-136.
Rowlands, Rawlsian Justice and Animal Experimentation.Julia Tanner - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (5):569-587.
Book Reviews. [REVIEW][author unknown] - 2008 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 13 (1):113-121.
Animal rights and wrongs.Roger Scruton - 2000 - London: Metro in association with Demos.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-27

Downloads
2 (#1,894,403)

6 months
2 (#1,685,182)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references