Sind pyrrhonische Skeptiker irrational? Radikale Skepsis und die Grenzen der Rationalität

Studia Philosophica: Jahrbuch Der Schweizerischen Philosoph Ischen Gesellschaft, Annuaire de la Société Suisse de Philosphie 68:121-148 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Pyrrhonian skepticism is the most radical and consequent form of skepticism. It is a way of life in which suspension of judgement leads to peace of mind . A Pyrrhonian does not believe anything, because he has the impression that there are no beliefs for which there are sufficient reasons. It seems to him that the reasons for the truth of every single statement are no better than the reasons against it . How can he then make claims and argue? Are his considerations not selfrefuting? Is he able to decide rationally between alternative ways of life? I try to show that these questions can be answered in favour of Pyrrhonian rationality. There may be one suspicion of irrationality left: For a Pyrrhonian, theory is a form of therapy and thus a means for successful practice. If rationality prevents him from having peace of mind, he would give up rationality for happiness

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,423

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mais quoi, ce sont des fous !Christophe Calame - 2009 - Studia Philosophica: Jahrbuch Der Schweizerischen Philosoph Ischen Gesellschaft, Annuaire de la Société Suisse de Philosphie 68:219-228.
Heideggerova metoda a světlina bytí.Antonín Dolák - 2009 - Studia Philosophica: Jahrbuch Der Schweizerischen Philosoph Ischen Gesellschaft, Annuaire de la Société Suisse de Philosphie 56 (1):47-57.
Hľadanie skutočnosti. [REVIEW]Jan Zouhar - 2009 - Studia Philosophica: Jahrbuch Der Schweizerischen Philosoph Ischen Gesellschaft, Annuaire de la Société Suisse de Philosphie 56 (1):123-124.
Ironie u Pascala.Dagmar Pichová - 2009 - Studia Philosophica: Jahrbuch Der Schweizerischen Philosoph Ischen Gesellschaft, Annuaire de la Société Suisse de Philosphie 56 (1):3-13.
Hegels Ausspruch „Gott ist tot“ in Hinsicht auf Kant und Fichte.Břetislav Horyna - 2009 - Studia Philosophica: Jahrbuch Der Schweizerischen Philosoph Ischen Gesellschaft, Annuaire de la Société Suisse de Philosphie 56 (1):15-30.
Jan Patočka a Kosíkova Dialektika konkrétního.Jan Zouhar - 2009 - Studia Philosophica: Jahrbuch Der Schweizerischen Philosoph Ischen Gesellschaft, Annuaire de la Société Suisse de Philosphie 56 (1):69-73.
Reflexie umenia v tvorbe Svätopluka Štúra a Etely Farkašovej.Erika Lalíková - 2009 - Studia Philosophica: Jahrbuch Der Schweizerischen Philosoph Ischen Gesellschaft, Annuaire de la Société Suisse de Philosphie 56 (1):75-84.
K interpretaci Hegelovy filosofie státu.Michal Vavřík - 2009 - Studia Philosophica: Jahrbuch Der Schweizerischen Philosoph Ischen Gesellschaft, Annuaire de la Société Suisse de Philosphie 56 (1):31-40.
Machiavelli dnes (politický, komunikatívny a sociálno-etický rozmer diela). [REVIEW]Ivana Holzbachová - 2009 - Studia Philosophica: Jahrbuch Der Schweizerischen Philosoph Ischen Gesellschaft, Annuaire de la Société Suisse de Philosphie 56 (1):119-120.
Albína Dratvová v zrcadle svého Deníku.Jiří Gabriel - 2009 - Studia Philosophica: Jahrbuch Der Schweizerischen Philosoph Ischen Gesellschaft, Annuaire de la Société Suisse de Philosphie 56 (1):103-113.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references