A Lockean Defence of Grandfathering Emission Rights

In Denis G. Arnold (ed.), The Ethics of Global Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. pp. 124-44 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A core issue in the debate over what constitutes a fair response to climate change is the appropriate allocation of emission rights between the developed and the developing world. Various parties have defended equal emission rights per capita on grounds of equity. The atmosphere belongs to us all and everyone should be allocated an equal share. Others have defended higher emission rights per capita for developing countries on grounds of historical accountability. Developed countries are largely responsible for the threat of climate change due to their past emissions and, since they currently continue to enjoy the benefits thereof, they should be willing to accept lower emission targets. However, in reality we see that developed countries currently have much higher emission rates per capita and will continue to have higher rates than developing countries for some time to come. There is talk of “grandfathering” – setting emission targets for developed countries in line with their present or past emission levels. What, if anything, can be said in defense of grandfathering?

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Lockean Defense of Grandfathering Emission Rights.Luc Bovens - 2011 - In Denis G. Arnold (ed.), The Ethics of Global Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. pp. 124-144.
Moderate Emissions Grandfathering.Carl Knight - 2014 - Environmental Values 23 (5):571-592.
Climate justice and historical emissions.Lukas H. Meyer & Dominic Roser - 2010 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 13 (1):229-253.
What is Grandfathering?Carl Knight - 2013 - Environmental Politics 22 (3):410-427.
Global Common Resources and the Just Distribution of Emission Shares.Megan Blomfield - 2012 - Journal of Political Philosophy 21 (3):283-304.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-29

Downloads
41 (#545,277)

6 months
14 (#226,974)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Luc Bovens
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Citations of this work

Philosophy’s other climate problem☆.Michael Brownstein & Neil Levy - 2021 - Journal of Social Philosophy 52 (4):536-553.
Climate Change Justice.Darrel Moellendorf - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (3):173-186.
Neorepublicanism and the Domination of Posterity.Corey Katz - 2017 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 20 (3):294-313.
Resilience as a Political Ideal.Avery Kolers - 2016 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 19 (1):91-107.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references