Peirce’s Epistemology [Book Review]

Review of Metaphysics 27 (2):378-379 (1973)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The author states that his purpose in this work is not primarily Peirce scholarship but epistemology. But the concentration is on Peirce’s theory of knowledge, a concentration which centers around what the author thinks is Peirce’s most valuable contribution to the subject—a solution to the problem of skepticism. In contrast to Descartes’ assertion that knowledge must be based on primitive intuitions, Peirce contends that all thought is in process, an organically intertwined system of inferences, a continuous flow of signs. Because thinking is a process in time, it is always fallible. Rather than this being a hindrance to knowledge, Davis sees this as the key to Peirce’s escape from skepticism, for the knowledge so described is a continuous self-corrective process, a web which, if we but make the effort to untangle it, will continue to reward us with advance toward the truth. Of more revolutionary importance to the theory of knowledge, according to Davis, is Peirce’s theory of abduction, his answer to the problem of how synthetic knowledge is possible. Abduction is the act of making up explanatory hypotheses. It issues in insights which are the outgrowth of creativity and imagination. The test of these unifying ideas is their appropriateness or ability to satisfy our sensibilities. It is instinct, or that to which we are naturally bent, which guides the abductive process. Throughout this book great emphasis is placed on the importance of this to Peirce and to an adequate epistemology of instinct, feelings, the work of the heart, or sensibility. The scientist, as Davis sees it, is thus akin in method to the creative artist. While Davis intends also to show how this aspect of Peirce is consistent with his pragmatic maxim, their relationship is never quite clarified in this work. Nevertheless, the book is a well-written and very readable treatment of Peirce’s epistemology. It also includes a great many comparisons with similar and contrasting positions as found in a wide range of contemporary and classical philosophical treatises.—B.A.M.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,459

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Peirce's epistemology.William Hatcher Davis - 1972 - The Hague,: M. Nijhoff.
Knowing truth: Peirce's epistemology in an educational context.Christine L. McCarthy - 2005 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 37 (2):157–176.
Royce’s The Problem of Christianity and Peirce’s Epistemology.Richard Kenneth Atkins - 2020 - American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 41 (2-3):39-55.
Subconscious Inference in Peirce's Epistemology of Perception.Justin Humphreys - 2019 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 55 (3):326-346.
Peircean Pragmatism and the Limits of Justification.Mark Christopher Rollins - 1991 - Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
The Point of Margolis’ Dissatisfaction with Peirce.R. W. Main - 2022 - Contemporary Pragmatism 19 (2):137-145.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
33 (#693,203)

6 months
3 (#1,486,845)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references