Bipedalism, canine tooth reduction, and obligatory tool use

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):507-508 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Bipedalism in the earliest hominid specimens is always accompanied by the reduction of projecting canine teeth. Body size is smaller than chimpanzees or humans, but molar teeth are markedly larger. Use of a pointed stick for defensive purposes on the one hand, and digging for USOs on the other, may be why bipedalism was selected for. Passing such learned behavior to the next generation may have played a role in selecting for language.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Relating brains, blood, and bipedalism.Grover S. Krantz - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (2):362-363.
Brain evolution in Homo: The “radiator” theory.Dean Falk - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (2):333-344.
Walkie-talkie evolution: Bipedalism and vocal production.Robert R. Provine - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):520-521.
The sexual selection of hominin bipedalism.Michael Dale - 2018 - Ideas in Ecology and Evolution 11 (1):47-60.
Prelinguistic evolution in early hominins: Whence motherese?Dean Falk - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):491-503.
Paleoanthropology’s uses of the bipedal criterion.Mathilde Lequin - 2017 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 40 (1):7.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
61 (#348,217)

6 months
11 (#338,628)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references