- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Computational complexity explains neural differences in quantifier verification
Cognition 223 (C):105013 (2022)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Tractable versus Intractable Reciprocal Sentences.Oliver Bott, Fabian Schlotterbeck & Jakub Szymanik - 2011 - In J. Bos & S. Pulman, Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Semantics 9.
Interpreting tractable versus intractable reciprocal sentences.Oliver Bott, Fabian Schlotterbeck & Jakub Szymanik - 2011 - In Oliver Bott, Fabian Schlotterbeck & Jakub Szymanik, Tractable versus Intractable Reciprocal Sentences.
Jakub Szymanik, Quantifiers and Cognition. Logical and Computational Perspectives. Springer, 2016. Pp. xii+211. ISBN: 978-3-319-28749-2 (hardcover) EUR 106,99; eBook EUR 83,29. [REVIEW]Giosuè Baggio & Heming Strømholt Bremnes - 2017 - Studia Logica 105 (5):1015-1019.
Improving Methodology of Quantifier Comprehension Experiments.Jakub Szymanik & Marcin Zajenkowski - 2009 - Neuropsychologia 47 (12):2682--2683.
Easy Solutions for a Hard Problem? The Computational Complexity of Reciprocals with Quantificational Antecedents.Fabian Schlotterbeck & Oliver Bott - 2013 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 22 (4):363-390.
Individual differences in the Simon effect are underpinned by differences in the competitive dynamics in the basal ganglia: An experimental verification and a computational model.Andrea Stocco, Nicole L. Murray, Brianna L. Yamasaki, Taylor J. Renno, Jimmy Nguyen & Chantel S. Prat - 2017 - Cognition 164 (C):31-45.
Coherence and Computational Complexity of Quantifier-free Dependence Logic Formulas.Jarmo Kontinen - 2013 - Studia Logica 101 (2):267-291.
Analytics
Added to PP
2022-04-08
Downloads
30 (#787,710)
6 months
3 (#1,061,821)
2022-04-08
Downloads
30 (#787,710)
6 months
3 (#1,061,821)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Questions About Quantifiers: Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Quantity Processing by the Brain.Jakub Szymanik, Arnold Kochari & Heming Strømholt Bremnes - 2023 - Cognitive Science 47 (10):e13346.
References found in this work
Generalized quantifiers and natural language.John Barwise & Robin Cooper - 1981 - Linguistics and Philosophy 4 (2):159--219.
A semantic characterization of natural language determiners.Edward L. Keenan & Jonathan Stavi - 1986 - Linguistics and Philosophy 9 (3):253 - 326.
Event-related potentials and recognition memory.Michael D. Rugg & Tim Curran - 2007 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11 (6):251-257.
On the grammar and processing of proportional quantifiers: most versus more than half.Martin Hackl - 2009 - Natural Language Semantics 17 (1):63-98.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-8567d8d854-xn8c5 dc2