Paper four: How should we think about resource allocation?

Health Care Analysis 4 (1):37-40 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What is immediately striking about the general problem of how to allocate resources equitably is that although the task cannot be done, it nevertheless requires to be done. Imperfection is the most we can hope for. But of course some instances of imperfection are considerably worse than others: and those evidenced in all too much of the thinking of medical specialists, whether in the current discussion concerning cancer care or, for instance, by those involved in the management of kidney transplants are frightening in their resolute refusal even to consider, let alone take adequately into account, the impact on the wider polity of their policies and practices.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,634

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
64 (#353,114)

6 months
12 (#262,569)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bob Brecher
University of Brighton

Citations of this work

Editorial: Research, Decay and an Antidote.David Seedhouse - 1996 - Health Care Analysis 4 (3):181-184.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references