Top-down and bottom-up influences on observation: Evidence from cognitive psychology and the history of science. In A. Raftopoulos (Ed.), Cognitive penetrability of perception: Attention, action, strategies, and bottom-up constraints.(pp. 31-47).

& (eds.)
Nova Science Publishers (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,902

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The theory ladenness of the mental processes used in the scientific enterprise: Evidence from cognitive psychology and the history of science. In R. W. Proctor & E. J. Capaldi (Eds.). Psychology of science: Implicit and explicit processes (289-334). New York: Oxford University Press.William F. Brewer (ed.) - 2012 - Oxford University Press.
Cognitive Penetrabiity of Perception: Attention, Strategies and Bottom-Up Constraints.Athanassios Raftopoulos (ed.) - 2005 - New York: Nova Science.
Distinguishing Top-Down From Bottom-Up Effects.Nicholas Shea - 2014 - In Dustin Stokes, Mohan Matthen & Stephen Biggs, Perception and Its Modalities. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 73-91.
Perception of Absence and Penetration from Expectation.Anna Farennikova - 2015 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6 (4):621-640.
Is perception informationally encapsulated? The issue of the theory‐ladenness of perception.Athanassios Raftopoulos - 2001 - Cognitive Science 25 (3):423-451.
Transduction, Calibration, and the Penetrability of Pain.Colin Klein - 2023 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 10.
How to (and how not to) think about top-down influences on visual perception.Christoph Teufel & Bence Nanay - 2017 - Consciousness and Cognition 47:17-25.
Fodor, modularity, and speech perception.Irene Appelbaum - 1998 - Philosophical Psychology 11 (3):317-330.
Perception is Theory Laden: The Naturalized Evidence and Philosophical Implications.William F. Brewer - 2015 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 46 (1):121-138.
Independent neural definitions of visual awareness and attention.Victor A. F. Lamme - 2005 - In Athanassios Raftopoulos, Cognitive Penetrabiity of Perception: Attention, Strategies and Bottom-Up Constraints. New York: Nova Science. pp. 171-191.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-10-01

Downloads
1 (#1,958,971)

6 months
1 (#1,596,857)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William F. Brewer
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references