The Boundaries of “Good Behavior” and Judicial Competence: Exploring Responsibilities and Authority Limitations of Cognitive Specialists in the Regulation of Incapacitated Judges

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 46 (2):521-523 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1177/1073110518782960

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,072

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Boundaries of “Good Behavior” and Judicial Competence: Exploring Responsibilities and Authority Limitations of Cognitive Specialists in the Regulation of Incapacitated Judges.Brandon Hamm & Bryn S. Esplin - 2018 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 46 (2):514-520.
Lessons in Legal and Judicial Ethics from Schiavo: The Special Responsibilities of Lawyers and Judges in Cases Involving Persons with Severe Cognitive Disabilities.Robert Destro - 2007 - In Charles A. Erin & Suzanne Ost (eds.), The Criminal Justice System and Health Care. Oxford University Press.
Democracy and judicial review: are they really incompatible?Annabelle Lever - 2007 - Public Law:280-298.
Do judges have an obligation to enforce the law?: moral responsibility and judicial reasoning.Anthony R. Reeves - 2010 - Law and Philosophy 29 (2):159-187.
Solomon Would Weep: A Comment on In the Matter of Baby M and the Limits of Judicial Authority.Randall P. Bezanson - 1988 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 16 (1-2):126-130.
Modern Legal Ethics.Charles W. Wolfram - 1986 - West Academic.
Judging in Good Faith.Steven J. Burton - 1992 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Judging the Judges: ‘May They Boldly Go Where Ivan Rand Went Before’.The Honourable Ian Binnie - 2013 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 26 (1):5-22.
Ethical Principles for Judges.Canadian Judicial Council - 1998
Sitting in Judgement: Moral Constraints on Judicial Reasoning within the Bounds of Law.Sara Lillian Bagg - unknown

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-20

Downloads
15 (#1,234,199)

6 months
4 (#1,249,230)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references