- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Simulation of individual and social action. Reply to Hurley
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Only published works are available at libraries.
My notes
Similar books and articles
Reply to 'the scope and limit of mental simulation'.Jérôme Dokic - 2002 - In Jérôme Dokic & Joëlle Proust (eds.), Simulation and Knowledge of Action. John Benjamins.
Reply to 'from simulation to theory'.S. Gianfranco - 2002 - In Jérôme Dokic & Joëlle Proust (eds.), Simulation and Knowledge of Action. John Benjamins.
De la neurociencia a la imitación Y la simulación mental. S. Hurley. & N. Chater, perspectives on imitation: From neuroscience to social science. Imitation, human development, and culture from neuroscience to imitation and mental simulation. S. Hurley. & N. Chater., Perspectives on imitation: From neuroscience to social science. Imitation, human development, and culture. [REVIEW]Tamara Arceo - 2006 - Laguna 18.
Reply to Alvin I. Goldman.William Child - 2002 - In Simulation and Knowledge of Action. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 45--21.
Reply to Can 'Radical' Simulation Theories Explain Psychological Concept Acquisition?.Pascal Ludwig - 2002 - In Jérôme Dokic & Joëlle Proust (eds.), Simulation and Knowledge of Action. John Benjamins.
Reply to Simulation Theory and Mental Concepts.William Child - 2002 - In Jérôme Dokic & Joëlle Proust (eds.), Simulation and Knowledge of Action. John Benjamins.
Reply to Varieties of Simulation.Jerome Pelletier - 2002 - In Jérôme Dokic & Joëlle Proust (eds.), Simulation and Knowledge of Action. John Benjamins.
Reply to Paul Bernier.Gianfranco Soldati - 2002 - In Jérôme Dokic & Joëlle Proust (eds.), Simulation and Knowledge of Action. John Benjamins. pp. 45--49.
Reply to François Recanati.Iérome Pelletier - 2002 - In Jérôme Dokic & Joëlle Proust (eds.), Simulation and Knowledge of Action. John Benjamins. pp. 45--173.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-03-19
Downloads
16 (#1,204,707)
6 months
3 (#1,491,886)
2016-03-19
Downloads
16 (#1,204,707)
6 months
3 (#1,491,886)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-lxkd2 dc2