Wishful Thinking vs. Hopeful Action: Response to Diehm on American Chestnut Restoration [Book Review]

Ethics, Policy and Environment 26 (2):354-358 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Christian Diehm has argued against using a genetically modified American chestnut variety in forest restoration. He is concerned that a GM variety sets a bad precedent and is disrespectful toward nature. He is also concerned that not enough has been done to consult with Native American tribes. We give evidence that consultation with tribes, environmental organizations, and the public is valuable and necessary – and that there is support for the GM chestnut. Genetic modification that saves a species from functional extinction shows respect to that species and its ecological relationships. Hopeful, wise, coordinated action is needed to save ecosystems.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,343

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-04-04

Downloads
26 (#892,543)

6 months
1 (#1,572,794)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Evelyn Brister
Rochester Institute of Technology

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

American Chestnut Restoration: Accommodating Others or Scaling Up?Christian Diehm - 2023 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 26 (1):69-85.
Not the Same Old Chestnut.Evelyn Brister & Andrew E. Newhouse - 2020 - Environmental Ethics 42 (2):149-167.

Add more references