Chunk and permeate, a paraconsistent inference strategy. Part I: The infinitesimal calculus

&
Journal of Philosophical Logic 33 (4):379-388 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper we introduce a paraconsistent reasoning strategy, Chunk and Permeate. In this, information is broken up into chunks, and a limited amount of information is allowed to flow between chunks. We start by giving an abstract characterisation of the strategy. It is then applied to model the reasoning employed in the original infinitesimal calculus. The paper next establishes some results concerning the legitimacy of reasoning of this kind - specifically concerning the preservation of the consistency of each chunk and concludes with some other possible applications and technical questions

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1023/b:logi.0000036831.48866.12

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,561

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Chunk and Permeate: The Infinitesimals of Isaac Newton.David John Sweeney - 2014 - History and Philosophy of Logic 35 (1):1-23.
Keeping Globally Inconsistent Scientific Theories Locally Consistent.Michele Friend & María del Rosario Martínez-Ordaz - 2018 - In Walter Carnielli & Jacek Malinowski (eds.), Contradictions, from Consistency to Inconsistency. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. pp. 53-88.
Handling Inconsistencies in the Early Calculus: An Adaptive Logic for the Design of Chunk and Permeate Structures.Jesse Heyninck, Peter Verdée & Albrecht Heeffer - 2018 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 47 (3):481-511.
Chunk and permeate III: the Dirac delta function.Richard Benham, Chris Mortensen & Graham Priest - 2014 - Synthese 191 (13):3057-3062.
Logical Pluralism: Another Application for Chunk and Permeate.Graham Priest - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (S2):331-338.
Chunk and permeate II: Bohr’s hydrogen atom.M. Bryson Brown & Graham Priest - 2015 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 5 (3):297-314.
Paraconsistency, Pluralistic Models and Reasoning in Climate Science.Bryson Brown - 2017 - Humana Mente 10 (32):179-194.
Sofic profiles of $$S(\omega )$$ and computability.Aleksander Ivanov - 2021 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 60 (3-4):477-494.
Paraconsistent Logic: Consistency, Contradiction and Negation.Walter Carnielli & Marcelo Esteban Coniglio - 2016 - Basel, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. Edited by Marcelo Esteban Coniglio.
Note on paraconsistency and reasoning about fractions.Jan A. Bergstra & Inge Bethke - 2015 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 25 (2):120-124.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
157 (#144,933)

6 months
15 (#190,835)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Graham Priest
CUNY Graduate Center
Bryson Brown
University of Lethbridge

Citations of this work

Impossible Worlds.Francesco Berto - 2013 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2013):en ligne.
Paraconsistent logic.Graham Priest - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Fragmentation and information access.Adam Elga & Agustin Rayo - 2021 - In Cristina Borgoni, Dirk Kindermann & Andrea Onofri (eds.), The Fragmented Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

View all 45 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Against method.Paul Feyerabend - 1988 - London: New Left Books.
Representing and Intervening.Ian Hacking - 1983 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35 (4):381-390.
Against Method.P. Feyerabend - 1975 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 26 (4):331-342.
Representing and Intervening.Ian Hacking - 1987 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 92 (2):279-279.

View all 9 references / Add more references