Explaining, Seeing, and Understanding in Thought Experiments

Perspectives on Science 22 (3):357-376 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Theories often run into paradoxes. Some of these are outright contradictions, sending the would-be champions of the theory back to the drawing board. Others are paradoxical in the sense of being bizarre and unexpected. The latter are sometimes mistakenly thought to be instances of the former. That is, they are thought to be more than merely weird; they are mistakenly thought to be self-refuting. Showing that they are not self-contradictory but merely a surprise is often a challenge. Notions of explanation and understanding are often at issue. For instance, we might explain—or explain away—a paradox by invoking some mechanism provided by the theory and showing how it does not really lead to a logically incoherent ..

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,401

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Taming theory with thought experiments: Understanding and scientific progress.Michael T. Stuart - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 58:24-33.
Philosophical imagination: thought experiments and arguments in antiquity.Boris Vezjak (ed.) - 2021 - Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press.
Grammar and Understanding.Paul Yu - 1979 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 9 (2):261 - 281.
Levels of description and conflated doctrines.John A. Bullinaria - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):832-833.
The Value of Surprise in Science.Steven French & Alice Murphy - 2023 - Erkenntnis 88 (4):1447-1466.
Explaining Away Intuitions.Jonathan Ichikawa - 2009 - Studia Philosophica Estonica 2 (2):94-116.
Thought Experiments as Tools of Theory Clarification.Grace Helton - 2023 - In Kevin McCain, Scott Stapleford & Matthias Steup, Seemings: New Arguments, New Angles. New York, NY: Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-09-07

Downloads
84 (#257,751)

6 months
8 (#390,329)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Robert Brown
University of Toronto, St. George Campus

Citations of this work

How Thought Experiments Increase Understanding.Michael T. Stuart - 2017 - In Michael T. Stuart, Yiftach Fehige & James Robert Brown, The Routledge Companion to Thought Experiments. London: Routledge. pp. 526-544.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Thinking about mechanisms.Peter Machamer, Lindley Darden & Carl F. Craver - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (1):1-25.
The scientific image.C. Van Fraassen Bas - 1980 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Causality and explanation.Wesley C. Salmon - 1998 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Explanation and scientific understanding.Michael Friedman - 1974 - Journal of Philosophy 71 (1):5-19.
Explanatory unification.Philip Kitcher - 1981 - Philosophy of Science 48 (4):507-531.

View all 18 references / Add more references