Galileo, the Elements, and the Tides

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 7 (4):337-351 (1976)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

For many historians Galileo’s attempt to account for the tides as a result of the combined daily and annual motion of the earth, and his belief that this argument provided a physical proof that the earth moves, stands as something of an embarrassment. Not only are there serious empirical and conceptual difficulties with this proposal, but it seems blatantly inconsistent with Galileo’s own theory of motion.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,297

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
50 (#440,682)

6 months
10 (#422,339)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Harold I. Brown
Northern Illinois University

References found in this work

Galileo's Claim to Fame: The Proof that the Earth Moves From the Evidence of the Tides.W. R. J. Shea - 1970 - British Journal for the History of Science 5 (2):111-127.
Galileo's theory of the tides.E. J. Aiton - 1954 - Annals of Science 10 (1):44-57.
The Sleepwalkers. [REVIEW]Stephen Toulmin - 1962 - Journal of Philosophy 59 (18):500-503.

Add more references