How to be realistic about inconsistency in science

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 21 (2):281-294 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/0039-3681(90)90027-6

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

John Woods and Bryson brown, eds. New studies in exact phi-losophy: Logic, mathematics and science. Proceedings of the 1999 conference of the society of exact philosophy. Oxford: Hermes science publishing, 2001. Isbn 1-903398-18-7. Pp. VIII+ 326. [REVIEW]Jairo Jose & B. Wrigley - 1999 - History and Philosophy of Logic 20:1-31.
Inconsistency and scientific reasoning.Joel M. Smith - 1988 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 19 (4):429-445.
A Realistic Look Backward.J. D. Trout - 1994 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 25 (1):37-64.
How scientists stopped talking about science.Matthew Stanley - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (1):235-239.
How to think about analogical inferences: A reply to Norton.Benjamin S. Genta - 2020 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 82:17-24.
"Science Philosophy and Religion"; and "Science Philosophy and Religion," Third Symposium, ed. Lyman Bryson and Louis Finkelstein. [REVIEW]R. F. Smith - 1944 - Modern Schoolman 21 (3):174-176.
Exemplary philosophy of science: How to do it. [REVIEW]Maureen A. O’Malley - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 45 (1):149-152.
"Science Philosophy and Religion"; and "Science Philosophy and Religion," Third Symposium, ed. Lyman Bryson and Louis Finkelstein. [REVIEW]R. F. Smith - 1944 - Modern Schoolman 21 (3):174-176.
An Intimate Relation: Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science. James R. Brown, Jurgen Mittelstrass. [REVIEW]George Gale - 1992 - Philosophy of Science 59 (4):711-712.
What was historical about natural history? Contingency and explanation in the science of living things.Peter Harrison - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 58:8-16.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-17

Downloads
77 (#271,558)

6 months
9 (#477,108)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bryson Brown
University of Lethbridge

Citations of this work

The Logic of Pragmatic Truth.Newton C. A. Da Costa, Otávio Bueno & Steven French - 1998 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 27 (6):603-620.
The Need for Adaptative Logics in Epistemology.Diderik Batens - 2004 - In S. Rahman (ed.), Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 459-485.
Is mathematical rigor necessary in physics?Kevin Davey - 2003 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (3):439-463.

View all 24 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

How the laws of physics lie.Nancy Cartwright - 1983 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Inference and necessity.P. K. Schotch & R. E. Jennings - 1980 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 9 (3):327-340.

Add more references