Metaphor as a Function of Language, Intention, and Interpretation

Gnosis 3 (1):18-34 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Metaphor straddles both epistemology and metaphysics. What makes metaphor elusive is intimately bound up in its dual character, a "thing" of the imagination covering both knowledge and reality. Due to its unique position, metaphor is often only understood up to a certain point: we frame it solely as a concern of knowledge or only as a matter of what is. In order to appreciate the impact metaphor has for both of these realms, this paper takes up three constitutive concepts of metaphor (truth, meaning, and reference), and attempts to understand what the content is of each on both sides of the epistemology/metaphysics fence.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Is Said by Metaphor.Hsiu-lin Ku - 2014 - Soochow Journal of Philosophical Studies 30:35-53.
Davidson's critique of the metaphorical meaning.Jakub Macha - 2009 - Filosoficky Casopis 57:139-150.
What Metaphors Mean.Donald Davidson - 1978 - Critical Inquiry 5 (1):31-47.
The Life and Death of a Metaphor, or the Metaphysics of Metaphor.Josef Stern - 2007 - The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 3.
Method, Metaphysics, Metaphor (Being after Phenomenology).W. Chris Hackett - 2014 - Symposium: Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie continentale 18 (2):54-76.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-25

Downloads
371 (#76,775)

6 months
65 (#89,708)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references