- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Political Philosophy of Science Policy
Minerva 42 (1):77-95 (2004)
Abstract
Reviews the book "Science, Truth, and Democracy," by Philip KitcherAuthor's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Mark B. Brown, Science in Democracy. Expertise, Institutions, and Representation.Robert Hoppe - 2011 - Minerva 49 (3):349-354.
Science, truth, and democracy. [REVIEW]M. Ruse - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (2):280 – 281.
Philip Kitcher, Science, Truth, and Democracy:Science, Truth, and Democracy.Daniel M. Hausman - 2003 - Ethics 113 (2):423-428.
The Relationship Between Science and Democracy on Philip Kitcher’s Perspectives.Moch Zihad Islami & Lailiy Muthmainnah - 2023 - Kanz Philosophia : A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism 9 (2):263-292.
Science and the Common Good: Thoughts on Philip Kitcher’s S cience, Truth, and Democracy.Helen E. Longino - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 69 (4):560-568.
Philip Kitcher. Science, Truth, and Democracy. xiii + 256 pp., index. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. $27.50.Mario Bunge - 2005 - Isis 96 (4):679-680.
Science in Democracy: Expertise, Institutions, and Representation by Mark B. Brown. [REVIEW]Matthew J. Brown - 2010 - Isis 101 (3):686-687.
Disagreement, Democracy, and the Goals of Science: Is a Normative Philosophy of Science Possible, If Ethical Inquiry Is Not?Arnon Keren - 2011 - Philosophy 86 (4):525-544.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-11-01
Downloads
46 (#481,746)
6 months
13 (#261,362)
2013-11-01
Downloads
46 (#481,746)
6 months
13 (#261,362)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Lessons from the vioxx debacle: What the privatization of science can teach us about social epistemology.Justin Biddle - 2007 - Social Epistemology 21 (1):21 – 39.
Extra-academic transdisciplinarity and scientific pluralism: what might they learn from one another?Inkeri Koskinen & Uskali Mäki - 2016 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 6 (3):419-444.
Can patents prohibit research? On the social epistemology of patenting and licensing in science.Justin B. Biddle - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 45:14-23.
Feyerabend, funding, and the freedom of science: the case of traditional Chinese medicine.Jamie Shaw - 2021 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (2):1-27.
Epistemic Standards for Participatory Technology Assessment: Suggestions Based Upon Well-Ordered Science.Juan M. Durán & Zachary Pirtle - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (3):1709-1741.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-sfdq8 dc2