Failure in Science and Why It Is a Good Thing

Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 61 (2):301-310 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

For centuries, if not millennia, philosophers have been debating the question of how science works and what it essentially is. Many have claimed that science is fundamentally characterized by the application of a specific method: the scientific method. What constitutes this method precisely, has been the subject of an extensive debate. In the 17th century, scholars like Francis Bacon or Isaac Newton advocated a strongly empiricist and inductivist method for science. According to this method, general empirical statements must be derived in a stepwise process from observational data: a theory may be seen as confirmed if its statements are generated and tested according to the rules of inductive inference. In the 19th...

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,888

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-08-23

Downloads
31 (#727,171)

6 months
10 (#404,653)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references