Protecting Human Health and Security in Digital Europe: How to Deal with the “Privacy Paradox”?

Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (3):639-658 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article is the result of an international research between law and ethics scholars from Universities in France and Switzerland, who have been closely collaborating with technical experts on the design and use of information and communication technologies in the fields of human health and security. The interdisciplinary approach is a unique feature and guarantees important new insights in the social, ethical and legal implications of these technologies for the individual and society as a whole. Its aim is to shed light on the tension between secrecy and transparency in the digital era. A special focus is put from the perspectives of psychology, medical ethics and European law on the contradiction between individuals’ motivations for consented processing of personal data and their fears about unknown disclosure, transferal and sharing of personal data via information and communication technologies (named the “privacy paradox”). Potential benefits and harms for the individual and society resulting from the use of computers, mobile phones, the Internet and social media are being discussed. Furthermore, the authors point out the ethical and legal limitations inherent to the processing of personal data in a democratic society governed by the rule of law. Finally, they seek to demonstrate that the impact of information and communication technology use on the individuals’ well-being, the latter being closely correlated with a high level of fundamental rights protection in Europe, is a promising feature of the socalled “e-democracy” as a new way to collectively attribute meaning to large-scale online actions, motivations and ideas

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The problem of the consent for the processing of health data, particularly for biomedical research purposes, from the perspective of fundamental rights protection in the Digital Era.Joaquín Sarrión Esteve - 2018 - Revista de Derecho y Genoma Humano: Genética, Biotecnología y Medicina Avanzada = Law and the Human Genome Review: Genetics, Biotechnology and Advanced Medicine 48:107-132.
Inaccuracy as a privacy-enhancing tool.Gloria González Fuster - 2010 - Ethics and Information Technology 12 (1):87-95.
Trust and privacy in the future internet—a research perspective.Dirk Rooy & Jacques Bus - 2010 - Identity in the Information Society 3 (2):397-404.
Trust and privacy in the future internet—a research perspective.Dirk van Rooy & Jacques Bus - 2010 - Identity in the Information Society 3 (2):397-404.
Ethical practice in sharing and mining medical data.Kevin Watson & Dinah M. Payne - 2021 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 19 (1):1-19.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-21

Downloads
60 (#356,604)

6 months
4 (#1,252,858)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Isabell Büschel
Universität Basel

References found in this work

Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity.Ulrich Beck, Mark Ritter & Jennifer Brown - 1993 - Environmental Values 2 (4):367-368.
On liberty.John Stuart Mill - 2000 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring Philosophy: An Introductory Anthology. New York, NY, United States of America: Oxford University Press USA. pp. 519-522.

Add more references