Sources of scepticism in atomic theory

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (38):120-134 (1959)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 107,007

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Reply to Gerd Buchdahl.David Bloor - 1982 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 13 (4):305.
Gerd Buchdahl :: Founding Editor.[author unknown] - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (3):401-405.
Hermeneutic strategies in Gerd Buchdahl’s Kantian philosophy of science.Nick Jardine - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (1):183-208.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
133 (#178,035)

6 months
14 (#278,086)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Nineteenth-Century Atomic Debates and the Dilemma of an 'Indifferent Hypothesis'.Mary Jo Nye - 1976 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 7 (3):245.
Saving Mach’s View on Atoms.Manuel Bächtold - 2010 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 41 (1):1-19.
The Background to the Discovery of Dulong and Petit's Law.Robert Fox - 1968 - British Journal for the History of Science 4 (1):1-22.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references