The contributions of the interdisciplinary study of language to an understanding of mind

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):101-102 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Carpendale & Lewis (C&L) emphasize the importance of viewing language as activity. In this commentary I push further their claim by highlighting how constructions, rather than words, are the appropriate unit of analysis. In addition, I suggest how a discussion of indexicality paves the way for a better understanding of how language provides a powerful tool for children's construction of mind.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Children's understanding of mind: Constructivist but theory-like.Ted Ruffman - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):120-121.
Understanding self and other.R. Peter Hobson - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):109-110.
The role of social experience in advanced social understanding.Robin Banerjee - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):97-98.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
43 (#520,994)

6 months
4 (#1,255,690)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references