Comments on the precarious relationship between history and philosophy of science

Perspectives on Science 10 (4):398-407 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,518

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Comments on Richard McDonough's, “Kant's Argument Against the Possibility of Cognitive Science".Frank Kirkland - 1995 - Proceedings of the Eighth International Kant Congress 1:1361-1365.
Method and Epistemology in Science: Some Counter-Comments on Chance.Paulos Mar Gregorios - 1992 - In Jayant Vishnu Narlikar, Indu Banga & Chhanda Gupta (eds.), Philosophy of science: perspectives from natural and social sciences. Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers. pp. 137.
The blurring and entanglement of philosophy and science : a response.Patti Lather - 2017 - In Antoinette Errante, Jackie M. Blount & Bruce A. Kimball (eds.), Philosophy and history of education: diverse perspectives on their value and relationship. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
Philosophy of science and historical enquiry.John Losee - 1987 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
59 (#366,638)

6 months
19 (#158,749)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?