- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Response to Critics
Australasian Philosophical Review 5 (3):309-321 (2021)
Abstract
Let me begin by sincerely thanking the commentators for taking the time to share their insightful reactions to the target article [Callender 2022a]. I am very fortunate to have so many talented, di...Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Response to critics.Paul Guyer - 2007 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 50 (5):497 – 510.
Response to Critics.William Dean - 2004 - American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 25 (2):163 - 177.
Response to critics.Thomas C. Brickhouse & Nicholas D. Smith - 2012 - Analytic Philosophy 53 (2):234-248.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-02-10
Downloads
23 (#955,400)
6 months
4 (#1,288,968)
2023-02-10
Downloads
23 (#955,400)
6 months
4 (#1,288,968)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
Why We Should Reject S.Derek Parfit - 1984 - In Reasons and Persons. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-sfdq8 dc2