Continuous Accessibility Modal Logics

Journal of Philosophical Logic 52 (1):221-266 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In classical modal semantics, a binary accessibility relation connects worlds. In this paper, we present a uniform and systematic treatment of modal semantics with a continuous accessibility relation alongside the continuous accessibility modal logics that they model. We develop several such logics for a variety of philosophical applications. Our main conclusions are as follows. Modal logics with a continuous accessibility relation are sound and complete in their natural classes of models. The class of Kripke frames where a continuous accessibility relation has a magnitude characterizing its degree of accessibility is not modally definable, and this has unappreciated significance to completeness proofs for such logics, revealing a methodological advantage of using classical multimodal semantics over fuzzy modal semantics. There is a pseudometric space modal logic that is complete in the class of pseudometric spaces, a natural semantic setting for quantitative modal reasoning about similarity. There is a metric space modal logic that is complete in the class of metric spaces, a natural semantic setting for quantitative modal reasoning about neighborhoods and counterfactual stability. There is a real line continuous temporal logic that is canonical for real lines, a natural semantic setting for quantitative modal reasoning about time.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Compatibility and accessibility: lattice representations for semantics of non-classical and modal logics.Wesley Holliday - 2022 - In David Fernández Duque & Alessandra Palmigiano (eds.), Advances in Modal Logic, Vol. 14. College Publications. pp. 507-529.
Counterfactuals and Accessibility.Daniel Kodaj - 2016 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 5 (2):147-156.
Standard Gödel Modal Logics.Xavier Caicedo & Ricardo O. Rodriguez - 2010 - Studia Logica 94 (2):189-214.
Labelled modal logics: Quantifiers. [REVIEW]David Basin, Seán Matthews & Luca Viganò - 1998 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 7 (3):237-263.
Modal logic.Yde Venema - 2000 - Philosophical Review 109 (2):286-289.
Modal Logics of Metric Spaces.Guram Bezhanishvili, David Gabelaia & Joel Lucero-Bryan - 2015 - Review of Symbolic Logic 8 (1):178-191.
A New Semantics for Positive Modal Logic.S. Celani & R. Jansana - 1997 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 38 (1):1-18.
Dynamic topological S5.Philip Kremer - 2009 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 160 (1):96-116.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-09-24

Downloads
39 (#567,216)

6 months
10 (#377,653)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Ranpal Dosanjh
Iowa State University
Caleb M.H. Camrud
Brown University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Modal Logic As Dialogical Logic.Patrick Blackburn - 2001 - Synthese 127 (1-2):57-93.
A two‐dimensional metric temporal logic.Stefano Baratella & Andrea Masini - 2020 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 66 (1):7-19.
A Logic for Metric and Topology.Frank Wolter & Michael Zakharyaschev - 2005 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 70 (3):795 - 828.
A completeness theorem for continuous predicate modal logic.Stefano Baratella - 2019 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 58 (1-2):183-201.

Add more references