Intergenerational Justice Today

Philosophy Compass 13 (3):e12477 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A theory of intergenerational justice consists in the study of the moral and political status of the relations between present and past or future people, more specifically, of the obligations and entitlements they can potentially generate. The challenges that justify talking about responsibilities between generations are myriad. And the disputes they prompt can focus on the past just as much as on the present, even though the fact that the human species has reached a state of technological progress that enables it to have an irredeemable impact on the planet and perhaps even endanger future human existence tends to make concerns about the future more pressing. Debates on intergenerational justice are twofold. The first revolves around the issue of whether claims of justice across generations whose members' lifetimes do not necessarily overlap could be justified. And the second revolves around the specific conception of justice in play, that is, around the nature of the standard that must be applied as well as around the identification of the contents of the duties that present generations supposedly have vis-à-vis past or future generations. This survey article depicts the conceptual and argumentative framework in which these debates are set. It aims to outline certain of the main features shared by the most influential contemporary theories of intergenerational justice, and the problems inherent in them. It concludes by suggesting that, even though the idea of succeeding generations is merely an abstraction, there are specific empirical states of affairs that require different theoretical responses to intergenerational justice.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,401

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Obligations of Justice and the Interests of the Dead.Janna Thompson - 2016 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 30 (2):289-300.
Conclusions.Wilfred Beckerman & Joanna Pasek - 2001 - In Wilfred Beckerman & Joanna Pasek, Justice, Posterity, and the Environment. Oxford University Press.
Temporal Vulnerability.Christoph Rehmann-Sutter - 2025 - Zeitschrift für Praktische Philosophie 11 (2).
Zipper arguments and duties regarding future generations.Tim Meijers - 2024 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 23 (2):181-204.
Intergenerational Rights?Richard Vernon - 2009 - Intergenerational Justice Review 1 (1).
Intergenerational Justice.Gosseries Axel & Meyer Lukas H. (eds.) - 2009 - Oxford, Royaume-Uni: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-01-25

Downloads
103 (#211,788)

6 months
11 (#246,005)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andre Santos Campos
Universidade Nova de Lisboa

References found in this work

Reasons and Persons.Joseph Margolis - 1984 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (2):311-327.
Political Liberalism.J. Rawls - 1995 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.

View all 61 references / Add more references