No More Larking Around! Why We Need Male LARCs

Hastings Center Report 41 (5):22-26 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Modern contraceptives—especially long-acting, reversible contraceptives, or LARCs—are typically seen as a boon for humanity and for women, the majority of their users, in particular. But the disparity between the number and types of female and male LARCs is problematic for at least two reasons: first, because it forces women to assume most of the financial and health-related responsibilities of contraception, and second, because men’s reproductive autonomy is diminished by it. In order to understand how to change our current contraceptive arrangement, I want to look at some of the historical and contemporary factors that contribute to this disparity, especially gender norms that associate women with reproduction ..

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Competing Social Norms.Lisa Campo-Engelstein - 2012 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (1):67-84.
Changes in contraceptive use in vietnam.Nguyen Minh Thang & Vu Thu Huong - 2003 - Journal of Biosocial Science 35 (4):527-543.
Learning from Me Too.Rachel L. Zacharias - 2018 - Hastings Center Report 48 (4):inside back cover-inside back co.
On Reproduction: Rights, Responsibilities and Males.Barbara Jean Hall - 1997 - Dissertation, The University of Arizona

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-09-08

Downloads
42 (#530,464)

6 months
1 (#1,886,877)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?