The Ontology of Modern Terrorism: Hegel, Terrorism Studies and Dynamics of Violence

Cosmos and History 6 (1):60-90 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

While the terrorism studies literature speaks of a shape of terrorism unique to modernity, the exact nature of modern terrorism, let alone the nature of modernity or its starting point, remain much in dispute. In this article we suggest that the confusion and conflict within the literature arises from a tendency to focus on certain outward or inessential features associated with modernity. In order to truly answer the question of what makes modern terrorism modern, the question needs to be set on a new footing, one which inquires into the necessary and not instrumental relationship between modernity and terrorism—i.e., that inquires into the possibility of an inner dynamic which can take us from the nature of modernity itself to terrorism. In this article we suggest that the intellectual resources for an understanding of modern terrorism in the fullest sense can be found within the preeminent nineteenth-century philosopher of the birth of the modern, G.W.F. Hegel. More specifically, through a reconstruction of Hegel’s account of the French Revolution we can uncover the possibility of understanding modern terrorism as an ontological rather than a temporal category. In other words, we can uncover resources that help us grasp what modern terrorism is, rather than in what age—with its instrumental possibilities given by, say, technology or ideology—it is found. What makes modern terrorism truly modern, we will argue, is a particular shape of self-consciousness that, Hegel shows us, stands as the deep structure of early modernity, and which contains within it an inner dynamic towards a uniquely modern shape of terrorism. While all terrorism that occurs within modernity is not modern, a truly modern terrorism can be identified

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,401

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Terrorism as ‘Apocalyptic Violence’.Matthias Riedl - 2017 - Social Imaginaries 3 (2):77-107.
Law, text, terror.Ian Ward - 2009 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Can just war theory delegitimate terrorism?Naomi Sussmann - 2013 - European Journal of Political Theory 12 (4):425-446.
Terrorism: from Ethnic Cleansing to Lone Wolves.Paul Dumouchel - 2017 - Philosophical Journal of Conflict and Violence 1 (2).
What Is Terrorism?Igor Primoratz - 1990 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 7 (2):129-138.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-18

Downloads
35 (#678,037)

6 months
4 (#864,415)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joshua D. Goldstein
University of Calgary

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Two Concepts of Liberty.Isaiah Berlin - 2002 - In Liberty. Oxford University Press.
Hegel and Prussianism.T. M. Knox - 1940 - Philosophy 15 (57):51 - 63.

Add more references