Twenty-Five Years after Quinlan: A Review of the Jurisprudence of Death and Dying [Book Review]

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 29 (2):182-196 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ever since the 1960s, when medical science became capable of prolonging the dying process beyond bounds that many patients would find acceptable, people have sought “death with dignity,” or “a natural death,” or “a good death.” Once debilitation from a fatal affliction has reached a personally intolerable point, dying patients have sought to control the manner and timing of death via diverse techniques. Some sought the disconnection of life-sustaining medical interventions, such as respirators and dialysis machines. Beyond freedom from unwelcome interventions, some patients intent on avoiding suffering sought access to pain relief medication—even in dosages posing some risk of hastening death. Other dying patients sought access to deep sedation, even knowing that they would never emerge from the resultant unconsciousness. Still other patients voluntarily refused to eat or drink or to accept artificial nutrition and hydration.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,401

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Terminal sedation and the "imminence condition".V. Cellarius - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (2):69-72.
Oh death, where is thy sting? Reflections on dealing with dying patients.Erich H. Loewy - 1988 - Journal of Medical Humanities and Bioethics 9 (2):135-142.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-31

Downloads
86 (#251,873)

6 months
6 (#572,300)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?