- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
What the legislature did not say
Journal of Argumentation in Context 5 (3):249-270 (2016)
Abstract
The paper is about the uses of the argument from legislative counterfactual intention, in the field of legal interpretation and argumentation. After presenting the argument from intention in general, it distinguishes the varities of the argument from counterfactual legislative intention and discusses their justification conditions.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Statutory interpretation and the counterfactual test for legislative intention.Win-Chiat Lee - 1989 - Law and Philosophy 8 (3):383-404.
Legislative Intention Vindicated?Jeffrey Goldsworthy - 2013 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 33 (4):821-842.
Interpretation without truth: a reply to critics.Pierluigi Chiassoni - 2022 - Jurisprudence 13 (1):139-152.
The Relevance of Intention in Argument Evaluation.Charlotte Jørgensen - 2007 - Argumentation 21 (2):165-174.
Marmor on Meaning, Interpretation, and Legislative Intention.Jeffrey Goldsworthy - 1995 - Legal Theory 1 (4):439-464.
Legislative Intentions and Counterfactu‐als: Or, What One Can Still Learn from Dworkin's Critique of Legal Positivism.Damiano Canale & Giovanni Tuzet - 2023 - Ratio Juris 36 (1):26-47.
Modular argumentation for modelling legal doctrines of performance relief.Nguyen Duy Hung, Phan Minh Thang & Phan Minh Dung - 2010 - Argument and Computation 1 (1):47-69.
Argumentation from Reasonableness in the Justification of Judicial Decisions.Eveline Feteris - 2015 - In Christian Dahlman & Thomas Bustamante (eds.), Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation. Cham: Imprint: Springer.
Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation.Christian Dahlman & Thomas Bustamante (eds.) - 2015 - Cham: Imprint: Springer.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-12-19
Downloads
30 (#744,128)
6 months
9 (#464,038)
2017-12-19
Downloads
30 (#744,128)
6 months
9 (#464,038)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-sfdq8 dc2