Abstract

This thesis explores the philosophy of technology in an intercultural context of China and the West. It aims to investigate the interrelations and intercultural exchanges between Chinese philosophy of technology and Western philosophy of technology for achieving improved mutual understanding and inclusive growth. It consists of an introduction and the following papers. Paper I argues that Chinese philosophy of technology is not a parallel tradition, compared with Western philosophy of technology. The tradition of the philosophy of technology is practicing in China, analytical in Anglo-America, and phenomenological in Europe. This study initiates natural homogeneity and performance heterogeneity and contributions of the philosophy of technology in Chinese, Anglo-American, and European Models. Finally, a global agenda is proposed. Paper II argues that the reception of Western philosophy of technology in China is critical in openness and caution principles to mirror Chinese spirit of seeking truth from facts for Chinese technological practice. Based on the family resemblance and critical reaction, the philosophy of technology can be cooperatively and competitively enhanced between the West and China in intercultural exchange and critical reception. Paper III investigates the rationality and roadmap of technological determinism under Chinese and Western philosophies of technology. This study initiates dynamic technological determinism with design and innovation approaches, and effectiveness and efficiency principles. It explores the implications for science, technology, and human values, technological assessment, forecast, and policy. Paper IV examines science-technology relationships in Sino-Western philosophies of technology and considers the hints for innovation, competitiveness, and policy. This study argues on a theoretical framework for science-technology relationships. It proposes proper reforms in science and technology innovations, national competitiveness, and science and technology policies for policymaking. Paper V compares China-US engineering ethics educations in Sino-Western philosophies of technology. It proposes that professional engineering ethics education can play important roles in reforming engineering social responsibility by international cooperation. Paper VI explores the related processes, routes, and issues for the exchange and spread of the philosophy of technology between the West and the East. It argues on the eastward spread of Western culture and proposes a global philosophy of technology in intercultural exchange and spread