Non-Consensual Vaccination and Medical Harassment: Giving Vaccine Refusers Their Due

Journal of Controversial Ideas 3 (1):1-8 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article argues that non-consensual vaccination is morally impermissible, for the same reasons for which sexual assault is not permissible. Likewise, mandatory vaccination is morally akin to sexual harassment, and therefore is not to be allowed.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is Sex With Robots Rape?Romy Eskens - 2017 - Journal of Practical Ethics 5 (2):62-76.
Stigma and the Structure of Title IX Compliance.Jenelle M. Beavers & Sam F. Halabi - 2017 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 45 (4):558-568.
Good reasons to vaccinate: mandatory or payment for risk?Julian Savulescu - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (2):78-85.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-04-28

Downloads
1,563 (#10,491)

6 months
172 (#23,628)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mihnea Capraru
Nazarbayev University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Living Without Free Will.Derk Pereboom - 2001 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
A defense of abortion.Judith Jarvis Thomson - 1971 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (1):47-66.
Living without Free Will.Derk Pereboom - 2001 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (211):308-310.
The Ethics of Vaccination.Alberto Giubilini - 2019 - Cham: Springer Verlag.
Determinism al dente.Derk Pereboom - 1995 - Noûs 29 (1):21-45.

View all 7 references / Add more references