Relativism and Monadic Truth

Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK. Edited by John Hawthorne (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Cappelen and Hawthorne present a powerful critique of fashionable relativist accounts of truth, and the foundational ideas in semantics on which the new relativism draws. They argue compellingly that the contents of thought and talk are propositions that instantiate the fundamental monadic properties of truth and falsity

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 105,995

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
475 (#66,394)

6 months
17 (#181,050)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Herman Cappelen
University of Hong Kong
John Hawthorne
University of Southern California

Citations of this work

Mental Files.Francois Recanati - 2012 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Conceptual Engineering: The Master Argument.Herman Cappelen - 2019 - In Alexis Burgess, Herman Cappelen & David Plunkett, Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
Which Concepts Should We Use?: Metalinguistic Negotiations and The Methodology of Philosophy.David Plunkett - 2015 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 58 (7-8):828-874.

View all 246 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references